Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
613-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

613-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023733 50.881177)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023690 50.881173,-1.023692 50.881181,-1.023698 50.881189,-1.023708 50.881195,-1.023719 50.881199,-1.023733 50.881200,-1.023746 50.881199,-1.023758 50.881195,-1.023767 50.881189,-1.023773 50.881182,-1.023776 50.881173,-1.023774 50.881165,-1.023768 50.881157,-1.023759 50.881151,-1.023747 50.881147,-1.023734 50.881146,-1.023720 50.881147,-1.023708 50.881151,-1.023699 50.881157,-1.023693 50.881164,-1.023690 50.881173)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL